Authentik vs keycloak reddit Recent commits have higher weight than older ones. This design choice restricts you from analyzing directly which resources were changed and what in fact has changed. single sign-on). I’ve read a lot of Hacker News and Reddit comments and tried them out in the order presented here. Keycloak sure looks an impressive beast. This subreddit has gone Restricted and reference-only as part of a mass protest against Reddit's recent API changes, which break third-party apps and moderation tools. For apps that don't have any sort of authentication, or use basic authentication that I can turn off, I have 2 traefik forwardauth clients, one for some apps that all users can access, and another for other apps that I only want certain users to have access to. Choosing Criteria Conclusion: Choosing between Authentik and Keycloak boils down to your specific use case:. . On the other hand, Keycloak is an open-source IAM solution that can be deployed on-premises or in a private cloud, allowing for more Then dumped Authelia because I wanted to play with Keycloak, but decided on Authentik for SSO, but I also was trying to get headscale-ui working but couldn't get it to work. Come and join us today! Members Online. If someone would have time to help us work on the implementation, we can also offer some paid freelance work. And I am loving it! It uses Cookies that Authelia doesn't have passwordless login, and it's tied to email system. Sure! My headscale instance is secured via OIDC, provided by Authentik. I then added Keycloak but it was very difficult to upgrade when new versions came out. Currently I'm running osixia/openldap, with a wheelybird/ldap-user-manager frontend to manage users, all hosted on my Kubernetes cluster. I know things like Proxmox have the integration you can use, but what about things like VS code server or Trilium or things that don't have that realm feature. keycloak? I've got about half my services moved over to keycloak; it would be a real shame if I could ever finish a project so now's the time to discover something better. The authentication glue you need. It’s a good alternative to I have used both Traefik and KeyCloak previously but moved to Authentik. You might find it more convenient to just have all of your applications authenticate against your LDAP directory, so you can use the same credentials but wouldn't have I have setup Keycloak to use with Re: authentik vs authelia I've got both running, and I wrote a bunch of configs to make them each work in nginx (mostly based on the documentation from each of them, but consolidated for easy swapping). Use our APIs and fully customizable policies to automate any workflow. I recently discovered the Ory stack and an excited to give it a try since it promises a lot of flexibility thanks to their modular approach. I will always choose having control over my auth solution vs using some api provider. So if you plan to have many users, better use Authentik or Keycloak. Comparison between Supabase, Firebase, Auth. I always used the plex app on the devices and I heard cloudlfare can “ban” you for using their services for using plex. Authentik seems really cool and looks like it'll have more features, but it's also more complex to set up and make work with other stuff. Both are reliable in r/KeyCloak: Brining the KeyCloak community together to build the future of Identity and SSO. Sources in authentik can also be used for social Over the years I have run all three. 1. You could setup LDAP and use that for local services, then federate into Keycloak or authentik! Authentik does do that lovely thing where it does LDAP for you so I understand the want to change. Due to the small Server I realy don't know what the best SSO would be. One reason why I stuck to Keycloak was because I understood that Authentik was a more of a side project. . For sophisticated developers looking to self-host an authentication solution with minimal customizations, Keycloak is a good bet. Or check it out in the app stores     TOPICS. To say the least, we ended up going with So after talking on Reddit, I was recommended a product (It's open source) here in the comment section. Keycloak is nice, I use a lot of RH products, but it feels a bit bloated and dated. 0, etc). I think it was going to be a little over $100,000 for around 2,000 users. Or check it out in the app stores To us it looks like we are getting more and more popular against Auth0 and Keycloak. I'm not at all sure what keycloak does and what the differences are; I'd be grateful if someone could explain Our community is your official source on Reddit for help with Xfinity services. I was actually looking at Keycloak myself due to needing something more “professional looking” and something more “enterprise-y” which translates to our security guy hearing more about keycloak than authentik. Keycloak. I am using Keycloak on my day-to-day for about a year. Compare authentik vs authelia and see what are their differences. Keycloak is the most enterprise friendly solution of all IDP that I found until now. ; Both tools are excellent in their own right, hello guys , I want to use keyCloak front channel logout . Maybe I need to read the docs. I've grown quite tired of how painful it is to manage my LDAP server with multi-master replication. By 'slap in front of' I simply mean protecting self-hosted web services in the same manner that Authelia does with nginx. However, for organizations that prioritize cost savings and predictability, have the capability to manage their Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. Personally, I'm more comfortable using the more stable, longer tested keycloak over Authentik but I definitely see the appeal of Authentik captures the request and validates the user Authentik redirects after login to hedgedoc instance Top-right -> Login with Authentik Authentik is now used as OIDC provider, automatically redirects with user information Now logged in as elevated "user" in Hedgedoc Identityserver4 is not made by Microsoft. Questions about Traefik and Authentik / Authelia . Recently, I've started dabbling in Keycloak and This has been making me want to make my own in Go as all the authentication iam projects like supertokens, keycloak and others only use Python, Java, or node. Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. The installation and configuration process is more complicated than keycloak or authentik but when it works it just works. 11. I’ve been using Keycloak but I’ve been looking at production guides, and it seems like Keycloak maintains its own internal in-memory Infinispan cluster, which means the various instances of Keycloak container have to be coordinated together AND since each Oh cool. This is a self-hosted LLM user interface that makes using LLMs (large language models) much easier for the average person, as well as having additional features like web scraping, searching for Keycloak supports OIDC/oAuth and SAML out of the box but a requires a separate LDAP server if you have apps that can only integrate with LDAP and requires a separate reverse proxy setup to perform header based auth. Over the years I have run all three. OK so in the meantime I switched from authentik to authelia a while a ago and I am still using authelia today. I found SuperTokens! It took me 1 day to implement and can now peacefully delete all my tabs. Just point ports 80 and 443 to Authentik an let Authentik proxy it Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. Or check it out in the app stores A quick overview why authentik compared to Keycloak or Authelia: Simple user interface, unlike keycloak's massive forms I startet All the other options - Keycloak, Auth0, Ory, and Authentik (which I'm currently using) - all idle at ~1GB RAM usage, which is too heavy for self-hosting on an affordable VPS. As a result, newer applications which may be SAML/OIDC only ( Outline , Cloudflare Tunnel auth) are less accessible or require people to use "big tech" OAuth providers. This works fine for just launching the apps from NPM, but seems to cause issues w/ Authentik. So it does depend on your use case and requirements I use Keycloak as my SSO provider. I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong, but I To make good use of this I like to ses up a SSO server like keycloak or gluu. authentik. Growth - month over month growth in stars. Feature set. Eventually, I'm looking to migrate to nitnelave/lldap as it seems way tidier as a containerized app. Keycloak vs SuperTokens. That’s the way to grow! 👍🏼 Authentik is better than KeyCloak. Then, on the same VPS, I have a Caddy L4 container. I have 2 client under one realm when I logged out from one client backchannel log out logged out second client too but if I open 2 tab in my browser and dont refresh second client app , it seems like user is logged in , how Can I Rarely do I see such a mature response here on Reddit. As I’ve mentioned in multiple posts in the past, I use Authentik as my personal IdP. I followed this tutorial to setup Authentik and I was able to get it working the first time, but haven't had luck since. For some, I’ve invested 1 week+ of my time, for others, just a few hours. After dabbling with Caddy's auth-portal, nginx Vouch proxy, Keycloak and Authelia I found Authentik. We've tried to be balanced in the above comparisons for the points covered. In the end, you could consider Keycloak if you need SSO (Single Sign On) feature. The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives. On the other hand, users of I tried with Keycloak first but had too much trouble getting the Docker image to work, so switched to Authentik. And then much discussion ensues about how heavy or You may also want to use Keycloak, if you need some Identity and User management platform, and when you have complicated user access flow. Sources are a way for authentik to use external credentials for authentication and verification. I started with Authelia. Internet Culture (Viral) Amazing; Animals & Pets Keycloak vs Zitadel When it comes to open source IM Keycloak has been the goto option. One of those things I have recently started using it for is with Open WebUI. I also checked out some other options along the way, and ultimately realized that pretty much all of the options come with enterprise-oriented features that are just added complexity for the self-hosting use case. Keycloak or Authentik can sync User Objects with your AD, and serve Identity Providers for OpenID or SAML, so that you can authenticate with said apps, or authenticate over the My vote is for Authentik but I haven’t had a ton of experience with Keycloak to be honest. Frequently it seems like people also mention having synology boxes anyways. For whatever security vulnerabilities or bugs found between major versions, community users won't receive any update and are on their own. Or check it out in the app stores   Keycloak isn't an auth solution (at least in the way of having app integrations or an SDK), it's an identity manager. The basic options you need to configure when using this universal OIDC middleware include standard OAuth2/OIDC parameters such as response_type (flow), authority, client ID, client secret, requested scopes, sign-in and sign-out paths, etc. The project focuses on being easy to use, includes full OAuth and SAML support, as well as support for applications that don't offer native support for SSO. But then I saw that Authentik had integrations for Firezone (Didn't even know what that was, so thanks, Authentik!), and tried to deploy that, but that wants to use Caddy Authelia vs. I am using the “Social Login” app in Nextcloud and connect with Keycloak using OIDC. One to one rs between Users Keycloak + Spring comment. The open source, embedded into OpenShift, solution - keycloak - somehow didn't make the list. Now i'm testing Keycloak, i was able to set it up and it seams that is running just fine. I tried with Keycloak first but had too much trouble getting the Docker image to work, so switched to Authentik. Authentik 2FA (TOPT) Help Hi I run some selfhosted services and would like to expose them to the internet. Reply reply Top 1% Rank by size . 5. The problem is that normally I search the enterprise grade setup, that's why I use Kubernetes over docker, Hyper-v over proxmox and etc. Architecture and Deployment. We've (deathnmind and I) put together a guide on how to make it work with Traefik 2. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. We can help with technical issues, general service questions, upgrades I have a question about a keycloak and rocketchat docker deployment behind a native install of nginx, could you possibly help me understand what I am doing wrong? I am not getting errors in nginx, keycloak or rocketchat. As i have no experience with keycloak and CI/CD in general i have no idea how much effort will it take to configure and handle keycloak. Or check it out in the app stores   posted by loft. On the other hand, users of paid Though I was wondering how easy/hard it would be to make them all only use the Authentik or Keycloak login. My brief review suggests to me that it is an Enterprise solution. Or check it out in the app stores   In the past I've tried out both Keycloak and FusionAuth, and I'm now looking at Authentik, but I have one slight problem - I've got less than 1G RAM left available on the box I want to run it on, and they all seem to require more than that Personally, I found Authentik's UI to be intuitive enough to configure my applications without additional help. Authelia might also be an option if you need less features. 7+ and get past the I have previously used Keycloak (an OIDC provider) and found it very stable, but absolutely horrible to maintain. I’m only suggesting such things because I don’t know how to migrate unfortunately. I'd love to know more about why this opinion. Instead you need to rely on the Compare authentik vs Keycloak and see what are their differences. I don't have a guide for enrolling, but I do have a guide for setting up keycloak. Opt for Authentik if you need a lightweight, modern tool for small to medium deployments. I looked at Keycloak, same Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. Note that Keycloak is an identity manager/sso provider. It's worth taking a look at Supabase (Mozilla's alternative to Firebase) and Authentik (I've never used this one) but it's an alternative to Keycloak For example, KeyCloak provides a container image right on its download page. For immediate help and problem solving, please Hey folks, I self-host a shitload of apps, some for personal use and some for clients. I set up a proxy provider and an application and outpost. The tradeoff is that customizing a Keycloak system is authentication on hard mode. I am running two Duo applications both configured against my Keycloak 15. I want to setup cloudflare with npm. What's the difference betweeen an "auth solution" and an "identity manager"? One of the big differences between Keycloak and ZITADEL is how data is stored. Keycloak: 5 Key Differences . 0. Keycloak Overview. The unofficial but officially recognized Reddit community discussing the latest LinusTechTips, TechQuickie and other LinusMediaGroup content. Or check it out in the app stores   Like I mentioned on my other post about Authentik a couple of days ago, I was working on connecting Authentik to Nextcloud. Ory vs SuperTokens. Both Keycloak and Gluu offer features such as Single Sign-On (SSO), Multi-factor Authentication, and User Activity Monitoring. For immediate help and problem solving, please join us Adopt authentik to your environment, regardless of your requirements. Security Features. Here's a link to the config and compose files I'm using to run headscale. If your application does not support SSO, it's not going to magically let you use 2fa with that service. I found the self-hosted software Authentik meets my use case if anyone else is looking alternative to Authelia that supports OAuth services such as 'login with Discord' etc. Authentik and Keycloak offer security features like multi-factor authentication (MFA) and single sign-on (SSO). On the gluu-webpage is mentioned that arround 40-80GB HDD is needed for this. Of the three providers, Keycloak has the richest feature set. Internet Culture (Viral) Amazing; Animals & Pets Authentik has its own embedded LDAP server, it doesnt support all features (most notably, proper filters) but you can find it’s usage on the Authentik docs. Internet Culture (Viral) Amazing The config looks fine. Please give https://goauthentik. I'll try to fill it out as best as I can, but help is always welcome. Firebase is very good for small projects but customizing some things might be difficult. It was good but didn't have many features. Authentik and Keycloak are open-source Identity and Access Management (IAM) solutions for authentication, authorization, and user Compare Keycloak vs Authentik in Identity and Access Management (IAM) Software category based on 45 reviews and features, pricing, support and more For whatever security vulnerabilities or bugs found between major versions, community users won't receive any update and are on their own. A place to share, discuss, discover, assist with, gain keycloak does. We are working on a project that will View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. So far that has been rock solid. It seems that there is a confirmed bug, but it looks like Authentik has kinda only one person developing it and that can be a problem when we face problems or bugs. (by BeryJu) Software Identity Management - Single Sign-On SAML saml-idp saml-sp Oauth2 oauth2 oauth2-client Oidc oidc-provider oidc-client SSO Proxy reverse-proxy Authentication Authorization authentik Kubernetes Security. Not affiliated in any way, just a very Keycloak’s age shows most in its features. for custom apps you code OIDC is pretty good thing to support, you'll be able to swap out the IDP with less pain. Also, using either Authentik or Authelia, user can use SSO to register/login ? How can I control who can register? Even if you're not using the WhoIs API endpoint or nginx-auth, Tailscale arguably implements "single sign on" as the ACL rules define which users are allowed to access different resources and services, but the difference between Tailscale and a firewall is that the ACL rules are cryptographically tied to a user, and a user is authenticated with Choosing between Okta and Keycloak largely depends on your organization’s specific needs and capabilities. But it seems to me almost "too impressive". You need to stick something in front like an oauth gateway. AuthentiK: Best for small to medium-sized projects needing Authentik vs. The middleware takes care of all the hard work in between, and issues the final cookie to sign your user in. Any apps that support OIDC I setup as a client in Keycloak. js, Supertokens, Ory, Clerk, FusionAuth and ZITADEL. io/ a shot. ; Choose Keycloak if your organization requires enterprise-grade features, scalability, and extensive customization. If you mean that the counter changes by one or two votes everytime you reload, that's because of the way how reddit (or any keycloak is great, but it's very very difficult, it's only worth it for large projects. Auth0 vs. I think Zitadel is worth a look now as well. Microsoft has nothing to do with the project. Or check it out in the app stores I have Authelia up and running but I am wanting to switch to Authentik but can't figure out how to setup and how to set the middlewares for traefik. The user is able to login and shows up in my sessions, I also enabled and see events but it keeps redirecting me to the login It works, except for the Azure AD like I said before everything is working on authentik. Keycloak relies on a stateful approach to store IAM resources, like users, roles, and so on in its database. A coworker suggested that I should use keycloak instead of the current solution as it has many flaws. Authentik just has so many options for authentication and is comparable with virtually any Going over some authentication solutions, and identity providers, I stumbled across Authentik alongside the well known Keycloak (and previously was looking into SuperTokens) which I AuthentiK and Keycloak are both open-source identity and access management (IAM) solutions, but they have different features, strengths, and target audiences. I do like Keycloak is very light and can run on sqlite where Authentik requires a whole stack. 2 docker container - this is for limited fallback cases and set up through my login flow. ; Keycloak’s advanced configurations make it a strong candidate for industries with strict security requirements, like finance or healthcare. Personally I found Keycloak to be quite confusing in terminology not matching up with the oidc standard, but the UI (and product) is still easy enough for simple use cases. Or check it out in the app stores   Syno NAS to authenticate against Keycloak (OpenID connect SSO) I am trying to get this working with authentik - but at the moment everytime I login with authentik synology tells me that user or password are invalid :-/ Hi folks, I’m looking for an OIDC SSO provider (I’m using this more for B2C than B2B purposes) that is not Keycloak. /r/frontend is a subreddit for front end web developers who want to move the web forward or want to learn how. for IDPs, authentik and zitadel are pretty easy to use. : If I had to choose between Authentik and Keycloak I'd pick Keycloak any day. It has an integrated reverse proxy so no need to for Caddy, nginx or Treafik when using this. Auth0 primarily functions as a cloud-based service, providing a hassle-free setup without the need for managing infrastructure. They all should work somewhat the same though, and have the same end functionality. It has instructions on how to configure Authentik with WikiJS which might be of use to you. Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. I also checked out some other options along the way, and ultimately realized that Authelia + LLDAP do not allow for password resets by the users itself. Keycloak is an open-source Identity and Access Management solution, while Gluu is a highly secured Identity and Access Management tool. Should I use authentik or authelia? All the stuff will be the arr services (sonarr, radarr, prowlarr, overseerr) and not more. Am I just stuck putting them behind Authentik's proxy provider. I highly recommend you have a look to Authentik. KeyCloak is the open-source alternative, Compare : Keycloak vs Gluu. If you have questions about your services, we're here to answer them. I recommend starting with Authelia and see Choosing between Authentik and Keycloak boils down to your specific use case: Opt for Authentik if you need a lightweight, modern tool for small to medium deployments. Zitadel is ideal for cloud-native applications, while Keycloak suits a variety of deployment scenarios. Hello everyone, I have a Traefik installation and I wish to increase the security of my setup. Authentik: If you're looking for simplicity, it's hard to beat Authentik. In every post about which software to use for sso, the various candidates (keycloak, authentik, authelia, etc) are always suggested. If you're looking to find or share the latest and greatest tips, links, thoughts, and discussions on the world of front web development, this is the place to do it. SSO: Authelia vs Authentik | LDAP: FreeIPA vs OpenLDAP our community is the best way to get help on Reddit with your questions about investing with Fidelity – directly What are the pros and cons of authentik vs. #security #blockchains #identity We’re looking for help to decide on a path for our project - Keycloak or Auth0. BTW also keycloak and other similar products offer the oauth-proxy capability, Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. io is an extremely nice self hosted identity provider, but the documentation can be lacking in some aspects. I can not recommend keycloak for ease of use. Both open source, but while investigating Introduction. Authentik is also an option. it was initially all numbers as a test. authentik Keycloak Microsoft ADFS Azure/Entra ID So what I did was pull a Postgres15 container and on the initial setup of the template, had the authentik user and some random password, then a redis container and made sure the redis container password wasn't all numbers. Or check it out in the app stores   Authentik has been on my list of things to investigate and I've finally taken the plunge. I see now that the scope of SuperTokens was not what I initially thought it was. As I have mentioned I'm fairly new and inexperienced. Thats the biggest negative of Authentik for me. Let’s look at the main differences between AuthO and Keycloak. I will setup my first homelab, running on unRaid. ; Authentik’s security features are well-suited for smaller-scale environments, prioritizing ease of I have some time on my hands early next week so I'm thinking of setting up an extra layer of security and wonder which to choose? At the moment I'm only exposing Plex via Caddy, but may expose other things in the future. This is why Authentik needs to be on the VPS rather than on a local machine; it has to be spun up and accessible before headscale. Advantages. Choosing between Zitadel and Keycloak depends on specific needs. It's very capable, mature, but incredibly complicated @nj said in Authentik - Making authentication simple. I don’t have a lot of experience with Keycloak and zero experience with Okta but I will say this, when I was looking at using Auth0 (before I found out about Keycloak), Auth0 (Okta) was wanting a crazy amount of $$$ per year. I am extending it with plugins and themes. This app seems to work In addition to applications, authentik also integrates with external sources, including federated directories like Active Directory and through protocols such as LDAP, OAuth, SAML, and SCIM sources. Keycloak is an open source, SSO CIAM solution for complex enterprise environments. sh, recommend Loft as a solution at the end. r/selfhosted. I have the same config but the only difference is that my authentik and NPM are on the same network so I could refer to proxy_pass using IP:port, which in your case is Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. I might go and try to migrate over to that. Simplify deployment and scaling with prebuilt templates and support for Kubernetes, Terraform, and Docker Compose. RH-SSO features vs Keycloak . This approach favors organizations looking for quick deployment and minimal maintenance efforts. Everything from generating, encoding, reading claims is made within the application's filters. However, both these services have many more features than SuperTokens so we have not compared the features that SuperTokens does not have. (by BeryJu) If you're looking for a system that has more features, is user friendly, a nice admin ui and easy deployments compared to Keycloak. Then once Authentik matured I started migrating to it. Good for you. It appears as if Authentik should replace both Vouch and Keycloak so I'm trying to figure out how to implement it through Swag. Once logged-in to Keycloak, users don't have to login again to access a different application. Authentik is too heavy, complicated and likely overkill for what I need - couple services behind caddy that I don't want random internet people to access. I’ve been banging my head against doing this with Keycloak for a couple weeks now, if it The following are the primary differences between Auth0 and Keycloak: Deployment and Hosting: Auth0 is a cloud-based IAM platform that offers a fully managed service, providing ease of deployment and scalability. Okta is an excellent choice for those who need a fully managed solution with costs linked to user numbers and features. Thankfully half of them come with integrations for Authentik (which I chose based on featureset), a good sum of them support some kind of auth method Authentik goauthentik. dnuvcy xflukc rmqrx ucwqgvb cwuyg sixccq qytvidvq vnfmwzz jadzel enaqe